Luigi Garlaschelli “shrouds” his motives…

 {Hat Tip to Judge Sam}

 

There’s a buzz on the Net about a new report by Luigi Garlaschelli (pic above), professor of organic chemistry at the University of Pavia in Italy. In brevis, he claims that because he has been able in 2009 to create a facsimile of the Shroud of Turin using materials available in the Middle Ages, that the actual shroud is a fake made in the Middle Ages.

Clearly the forgery of relics was prevalent in the Middle Ages. Even the Canterbury Tales has the Pardoner quip:

“And stir men to devotion, marveling.

Then show I forth my hollow crystal-stones,

Which are crammed full of rags, aye, and of bones;

Relics are these, as they think, every one.

Then I've in latten box a shoulder bone

Which came out of a holy Hebrew's sheep.”

Nonetheless, Garlaschelli's logic is unbelievably flawed. His ability to produce a facsimile of the Shroud using medieval materials does not mean that the Shroud itself was so produced.

 

What I question is – what it Garlaschelli's motive?

 

“Garlaschelli received funding for his work by an Italian association of atheists and agnostics but said it had no effect on his results.”

 

Well, perhaps we could look to his PAST actions to ferret out his motivations?

 

Here he is “creating” a stigmata, unbelievably for National Geographic Magazine.

 

 

 

 

And here he is “creating” his own version of the annual Miracle of San Gennaro.

 

 

 

And here is his version of a statue that “cries” blood.

 

 

 

 

So he is funded by agnostics and atheists, and regularly “questions” supernatural phenomena that are associated with the Catholic Church in Italy.

Why?

All Saturday Night Live kidding aside, I don't know if the particular phenomena Prof. Garlaschelli has "gone after" are true. (Personally - I do believe that the Shroud of Turin is the burial cloth of Christ).

What I can tell you categorically is not true, what is false, is the notion that "science" can be dispositive on everything.

G*d Himself understood that inherent in the power to name or classify is the power to control. G*d had Adam name the animals for this reason,

and most explicitly He responded to Moses' question with "I am who am," for this same reason.

Your Thoughts?

Comments

[James M. Essig]

We live in an age of extreme intellectualism marked by mathematical, logical, and ordered knowledge and necessarilly so as we are now a technologically advanced civilization.

As someone schooled in physics and as a sucessful inventor with about a dozen patents with my name on them, I see the rigors of pure math and logic and ordered speculation as a way, not to deny the existence of GOD, but rather to point to the fact that GOD is bigger than we can ever imagine in the existential and ontological sense commensurate with GOD being HE WHO IS, or Pure Absolute Being in an inexpressibly unlimited sense.

When I think of the Shroud of Turin, I am a little dismayed that many folks view methodological and ordered inquiry as a means to widow away at the Catholic Faith, and more so, to widow away the esteemed place in Western Culture that the notion of a mysteriously incomprehensibly great GOD once had.

Although I am speaking as a private theologian and make the disclaimer that what I express below is not necessarily of the opionion nor belief system of the Catholic Church including the body of teachings within the Ordinary and Supreme Magisterium, the Church's Tradition, and Sacred Scripture validly interpreted by the Church.

Just about every Catholic has heard of the concept of the Holy Trinity, the reality that GOD exists as a Trinity of Divine Persons, The Father, The Son, and The Holy Spirit.

We can describe the set of three elements: 1) The Father; 2) The Son; 3) The Holy Spirit

We can see that there exist a set wise lexicographical relationship between: 1) the Person of the Father and Son; 2) The Father and the Holy Spirit; 3) The Son and the Holy Spirit; 4) The set including the Father and the Son and the set including the Holy Spirit; 5) The set including the Father and the Holy Spirit and the set including the Son; 6) The set including the Son and the Holy Spirit and the set including the Father.

Likewise, we can lexicographically denote the relationship between: 1) The set including the Father and the Son and the set including the Father and the Holy Spirit; 2) The set including the Father and the Son and the set including the Son and the Holy Spirit; 3) The set including the Father and the Holy Spirit and the set including the Son and the Holy Spirit.

Likewise we can describe the relationship between: 1) the Holy Triune Godhead and the Father; 2) the Holy Triune Godhead and the Son; 3) the Holy Triune Godhead and the Holy Spirit.

Still Further, we can describe the relationship between: 1) the Holy Triune Godhead and the set of the Father and the Son; 2) the Holy Triune Godhead and the set of the Father and the Holy Spirit; 3) the set of the Holy Triune Godhead and the set of the Son and the Holy Spirit.

Thus far we have a total of 18 defined sets which form a set we will refer to as S1. The number of subsets in this set of 18 sets is equal to 2 EXP 18 according to set theory, of course for strictly definitional purposes. However each such set is related to the other sets simply because they can be defined with respect to their distinctions. We will call this second set of subsets S2.

The number of subsets in S2 is equal to 2 EXP (2 EXP 18) which is an ensemble. We will call this set S3

The number of subsets in S3 is equal to 2 EXP [2 EXP (2 EXP 18)]. We will call this set S4.

The number of subsets in S4 is equal to 2 EXP {2 EXP [2 EXP (2 EXP 18)]}.

and so on. You get the picture.

Thus we can have S5, S6, S7,…,S(Aleph 0), … , S[Aleph(Aleph 0)] in a never ending series.

Note that set theory, Aleph 0 in the number of integers which is infinite. Aleph 1 is the number of real numbers which is greater than the number of integers by a factor of infinity. Heck, even between the integers 0 and 1 there exists an infinite number of real numbers, likewise between 1 and 2, 2 and 3 and so on.

There should accordingly exist values of so-called Cardinality of Aleph 3, Aleph 4, Aleph 5 and so on in a never ending series of ever larger Cardinalities.

I am in no way speaking for the Catholic Church, the Ordinary and Supreme Magisterial Teachings of the Church, the Church Tradition, the Revealed Truths of Sacred Scripture and Approved Apparitions of the Saints, the Blessed Virgin Mary, The Angels, and of Our Lord Jesus.

However, I have often wondered is such an eternal inexpressibly unlimited series of ever greater numbers of sets and the logical definitions that distinguish them might correspond to some deep and hidden aspects of GOD for which we have no knowledge of, i.e., which has yet to be revealed to us.

The relations between such sets must be considered real in the abstract sense of logical relations and set theory other wise the sets could not be lexicographically defined. Since everything about GOD is real to the extent that each thing about GOD is Truth, and in GOD there are no non-absolute characteristics, only absolute attributes that are at one with His Nature, Essence, and Existence, these three ontological characteristics being identical to each other for GOD, perhaps the enumeration of such sets points somehow to some yet to be described characteristics of GOD and which accordingly point to the utter immensity of GOD in the ontological, existential, and reality sense of the word.

Ever wonder if GOD might have in his existence or being the actuality of the possibility for math and logic to exist, more especially the possibility of set theory simply because He exists, and that perhaps the above inexpressibly unlimited series of ever greater sets has some kind of incomprehensible reality and being in GOD. Perhaps if GOD was not Triune, then math, logic, and any and all creatures could not exist nor be created by GOD as GOD exist as a Triune GOD.

The reader of this post will likely think I am acid or something, and perhaps I am just having a natural neurotransmitter level surge, but there is a least one renown spiritual writer who at around the turn of the 19 th/20 th centuries expressed his opinion that what we know about GOD as a result of revealed Dogma is just an infinitesimal tip of the ice burg regarding what we will learn about GOD in Heaven as we have all Eternity to commune with, love, and share our friendship with GOD as The TRINITY and GOD, and with and in each of HIS THREE DIVINE PERSONS on person to person level.

I like to quote the name of a popular movie about the theme of the afterlife that was released about 1 decade ago when I think about such things and that is “What Dreams May Come”. My sister Mary gave me the most inspirational advice many years ago as I was going through great personal difficulties with the simple statement “Jim, this life is just a stepping stone in eternity!” I will always remember that phrase regardless of any personal difficulties that I may experience at any point in the future.

Truly, there is room to use reason, informed speculation, and logic as a means of contemplating the mysteriously and ultimately incomprehensibly vast nature of GOD. If we can make statements such that the
Universe may be incomprehensibly vast, how much more so can we make statements about GOD who created it.

GOD BLESS!

Jim

[Sam]

Thanks for following up on the suggestion and doing the story. I suspect it won't be reported in the mainstream press. I have been privileged to visit Torino and the church containing "La Sacra Sindone."

Not surprisingly, my Italian cousins who took me there had never visited it before. Oh well, at least I made them go into a church.

[Wisdom]

What a wise sister!

[Cristian]

I believe that the Shroud is true. I think there are many fools who 'say there is no GOD'-- notice that I spell out the name completely. As to the stigmata, I think something odd is occuring when we see some really strange characters possesses it, or rather, the stigmata possesssing them.

[Greg]

To Jim:

Comprehensively stated! It's amazing to me that we can peer into the micro-cosmic world from the smallest of matter to the vastness of the universe and not come to the conclusion that there is indeed a God. The complexities of the relationships of all these entities need to be all aligned in this perfect order for own existence to be true. It is not mathematically probable in a great random assignment of all things for it to be the way that it is. This is the essence of intelligent design theory. I'm reminded of the old movie 'WarGames' at the end of the movie where the computer runs through millions of war simulations each resulting in the same conclusion and can only finally conclude that 'winning' the game is an impossibility. The same is true with 'scientists' each trying to disprove the existence of God. The more they try the more God's mystery is revealed.

One only needs to read Exodus and see the same situation that is occurring with the shroud. The pharaoh’s wise men were capable of reproducing similar miracles that Moses, through God’s Word, produced. But none to the degree to which God was capable of achieving. The “Shroud of Turin” and Garlaschelli’s ‘shroud’, although may appear slightly similar, are not at all the same. One only needs to look a little closer to see the vast details of the “Shroud of Turin” that are not replicated in Garlaschelli’s ‘shroud’. The fact that the blood on the “Shroud of Turin” existed prior to the image, while in Garlaschelli’s ‘shroud’ is added after the fact, because the process used by Garlaschelli would have damaged the blood dna.

[Jimbo]

Greg,

You stole my point exactly. Pharoah's men were able to duplicate God's miracles through Moses, but to a lesser degree. Remember, Moses's snake ate the snakes of the wise men. Why should we be surprised that the "wise" men of science would refrain from doing the same...minus the miracles. I wonder if the good scientist's forgeries have the power to heal anyone (as the Shroud), raise anyone from the dead (as Elisha's bones), or convert entire continents to a new religion (as the garment St. Diego). I doubt it. Exact replicas indeed.

[Michael Fichera]

Check out an excellent rebuttal of Garlaschelli's findings:
http://www.shroud.com/latebrak.htm

[Di]

I sincerely hope that Christians do not waste their time with this guy. His work is like so many other arguments regarding Christianity, even those among believers.

Faith is just that. Faith. Some of us have been blessed with the gift of faith while others have not. Some will come to believe, like C.S. Lewis. Other will not. Others will lose their faith.

What is most important is that we pay attention to what God is telling us about our personal relationships with him and grow spiritually. Minding the business of atheists can lead to neglect of God and others. In other words, even if the shroud were proven to be true, it would have ZERO impact on the lives of many Christians, or it would take away from what God really wants us to do: love and serve one-another.

[Gabriele67]

Garlaschelli false shroud is laughable, look at his own images, they speak for themselves. The (in)famous "scientific" (scientific?? LOL!) radiocarbon dating is false too, read the Nature's article on www.shroud.com and find the incredible (intentional??) computational error that makes the dating completely worthless. Clearly there was a plot.

The most reasonable explanation for the Shroud is that it really wrapped the body of Our Savior before his Resurrection.